get your google on. i've only heard pieces and reactions. sometimes, i get very introspective and mindful. blame woodie and his tammy posse for ganging up on me and making me think. one may say, rile.
Butker spoke his mind. from the little I saw, he chose his words very carefully. I absolutely admire a well phrased (and punctuated) sentence. He spoke about women being homemakers. He spoke out against pride month. He spoke from his heart. We can save the "i agree" or "I disagree" for now. My point is that it should be perfectly acceptable for someone to have a differing view. By so doing, you certainly create a rift. One side will get angry, for lack of a better word. Emotions run high and all of the sudden, the speaker is chastised for not agreeing with the masses. Its often said the majority writes history. The minority speaks out and angers others. Who is to say who is right or wrong?
My ultimate point is that usc sucks. and that I dont really understand how anyone could get upset with someone saying exactly what they are saying, but the opposite. Apparently, the media is speaking out against Butker. The social media "outrage" is wide. I am here to say I DONT CARE WHAT SOCIAL MEDIA THINKS, nor should Butker. If one side can say "I support cross dressing" the other side is perfectly capable of saying "I support moms being moms." Isn't that fair/just/right?
Deep thoughts....
oh and Trump '24
Bookmarks