It can get wildly more complicated. If you work on enough of them you will eventually have to swap limbs around, replace cam bearings, etc to get one right. But that should give you an idea.
It can get wildly more complicated. If you work on enough of them you will eventually have to swap limbs around, replace cam bearings, etc to get one right. But that should give you an idea.
My bow guy comes by the house, picks up my rig and about a week or more later it magically shows back up tuned and ready to rock.
I went back and forth between the HLR and the 5.0. My only gripe with the victory product with an outer weave is when you have to remove an insert they usually desheath since it is a multi piece arrow. I think they are great arrows, but not being to nock an insert out if one gets bent is somewhat of a pain. That's the only reason i moved on from TKO's. The HlR does come with a great stock insert, so im glad to see a mfg not supply something that should have been melted down for soda cans.
I just built 2 dozen Easton 5.0 .300sp. 28.25" c2c. Ethics titanium 25gn HITs. Easton collars. 125gn heads. 456gn total at 15%foc. They are shooting well.
I have a couple QADs and a Hamskea, both have been great. I move the cam until bare shafts are shooting a bullet hole with the rest at center shot. Then I make minor rest adjustments until a fixed blade flies straight.
Mechanical broadheads are for killing does and little bucks.
I'm a hamskea snob, mainly because I have never seen one fail out of a pretty large sample size. I have seen a bunch of QAD failures, but 90% of those are from a BS setup job. I like the method of timing a limb driven a lot better than a cable driven. If you put both in a draw board to set up its pretty clear which method of activation is the cats pajamas. The cable driven either falls too early, or too late unless you get it just right, then your cable stretches and you're back to fletching contact. I like the rest to cradle the arrow for about 60% of the shot cycle, and that's pretty easy to get right on a limb driver.
That's my take. A lot of guys like the QAD and they will kill a truck load of deer with them. But if I am spending my money, it'll be on a hamskea. If you arent having issues with your qad I wouldn't lose sleep over it. They do work fine some of the time.
The data QDMA collected says a mech is better. I don’t have an opinion. Both will do the job. I always have both in the quiver. I killed a 155” with a grim reaper and skipped a QAD exodus off a 175”s backstrap last year (you were a good shoulder to cry on). Neither would have yielded a different outcome. Made of good metal and accurate af are all I concern myself with.
The hot melt that podium sells has been great for me with iron will hit inserts
Member of the Tenth Legion Since 2004
I use the Bohning cool flex for inserts on my Grizzly Stiks. If one gets bent I just put a little heat to a field point and they will pop out without heating up the carbon too much.
Bookmarks