I’m interested for experienced opinions on the Vortex Razor HD LHT 3-15x50 compared to the Swarovski Z5 3.5-18x50, disregarding the slight difference in the magnification range. An MRAD vs BDC or MOA reticle doesn’t matter. My only real question deals with optical clarity and low light performance. The illuminated dot is key for both.
I did recently pick up a virtually new Razor HD LHT and have compared it to my Swarovski Z3 4-12x50 and almost want to give the edge to the Swaro, but recognize I’m biased since I’ve used Swaro scopes for 18 years. So are my eyes biased or telling me the truth?
I realize the glass in the Z3 and Z5 are the same, but haven’t checked on any coating differences.
Bookmarks