This has two parts, 1) an Amendment to the Constitution because of a Supreme Court decision, and 2) an
Ethics Committee to oversee the Supreme Court.
Immunity - NY Democrat introduces constitutional amendment reversing Supreme Court immunity decision that former presidents enjoy a presumption of criminal immunity for official acts.
This is self-explanatory. It's also highly suspect. One could imagine a situation where a democrat might support that immunity if a democrat president's actions were in question.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...4ccd0ea9&ei=78
Ethics - Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan furthered calls for reform at the High Court on Thursday, suggesting that a committee be created to examine potential ethics violations by justices.
Example: Calls for ethics reform at the High Court were first sparked by a report by ProPublica, which found that Thomas and Alito did not disclose luxury trips and other gifts he had accepted from Republican megadonors. The New York Times also reported that flags associated with conservative movements, including one related to Trump's "Stop the Steal" cry, were seen outside of residences owned by Alito in the aftermath of the 2020 election.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...77512147&ei=18
They are trying to remove and delegitimize the conservative members of the court. This is another piece of a coordinated effort to hold power. I added that last sentence for you, 2oof.
Bookmarks