I am. Attention starved whore. Nothing more. The poor cops are probably gonna get in trouble anyways for just doing their job, so one of them shoulda probably punched that little pussy with the camera phone in the mouth to shut him up and then shoved the phone up his ass
Last edited by jevans; 08-05-2020 at 09:27 PM.
Doesn’t bother me. What does, is 16 year olds wearing that shit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What about the 16 year old girls who see it and think it’s cool see how that works kids see adults doing it and then they do it. I like thongs and I like a nice ass which she don’t have but there is a time and a place for it and a public beach full of families with kids is not the place imo
After reading the write up, I’m pretty sure the thong wasn’t what got them reported or the attention of the police. There’s a part in there that describes the two women dancing erotically (read sexually explicit) that probably got the cops called. MBPD probably used the thong as a reason. Who knows, that place up the road is just trashy.
Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal? I wouldn't go so far as to call a dog filthy but they're definitely dirty. But, a dog's got personality. Personality goes a long way.
You might take out a dozen before they drag you from your home and skull fuck you to death. Marsh Chicken 6/21/2013
They were doing their job. Does that mean that she actually committed a crime?
Funny how a group of people that claims to "protect the consititution" (specifically the second amendment) then goes on to jump down some random girls back because her lifestyle doesn't fall in line with whichever religion or values you were raised with. This is the same thing as people who claim to be "righteous christians" but then pick and choose which rules to follow or break.
Simply put, if you choose to be an advocate for something then be behind it all the way. You can't just decide that someone else exercising their first amendment right (who objectively did not break a law) is suddenly guilty because "she is a trashy attention starved whore"- looking at you jevans. This is the same as the public deciding someone is guilty of a crime before they are given due process in a court.
Never confuse enthusiasm for capability
The only thing I did was express my 1st amendment right to say that a damn thong on a family beach is trashy if you don’t agree that’s cool with me! I’m all for 2A also but I think open carry is kinda trashy so what I have my opinion and you have yours and neither of us are wrong that’s the beauty of America or at least it used to be.
She’s a trashy whore. Bottom line. The dude with the camera is a punk. They have no respect for themselves or the people around them. Their plan was to be defiant. If it wasn’t then tell me why she didn’t go change her bathing suit and cover up her shitty scrony body and those crappy tattoos. And what about her friend who had on a white T-shirt with her nipples showing through it?
She didn’t change her outfit because she was acting within the law. Do you know these people? Because you have made a LOT of accusations with what you are saying. My guess is that you are willing to do so because you are insulated by the internet and a screen name.
Let me try to say this in a way that you might understand- “There is only one lawgiver and judge, he who is able to save and to destroy. But who are you to judge your neighbor?
Romans 2:1-3
That’s from the Bible, the other book that some of y’all claim to support. Being able to say you went to church on a Sunday and “live with Christian values” is literally the middle-age SC equivalent of “hunting ducks for the Instagram post”- you’re only doing it for public affirmation. Bottom line, just because you are “offended” does not mean she (or any of them) committed a crime.
That’s for the courts to decide.
Last edited by abarill; 08-05-2020 at 11:07 PM.
That’s fair woodie- I changed it to “some of y’all”. Not fair for me to assume. All I am getting at is that there’s not a objective law that she broke, yet people on this thread have made unfair judgments And claims against her.
Never confuse enthusiasm for capability
my take,
There probably is a law or should be but the cops were quoting "the nudity" one
and I don't think it applied here and that was her point. Maybe an obscenity law would be more like it
Suits are all getting thinner on the backside. That was a thong. I have heard thongs were forbidden. She was not nude. Both had forms of nudity.
"We all know porn when we see it."
Either write things worth reading, or do things worth writing.
Last edited by Calibogue; 08-06-2020 at 06:54 AM.
\"I never saw a wild thing feel sorry for itself. A small bird will drop dead frozen from a bough without ever having felt sorry for itself.\" <br />D.H. LAWRENCE
Bookmarks