Yeah supposedly. It has a sort of chemically smell to it. Check out the scent crusher products too
Yeah supposedly. It has a sort of chemically smell to it. Check out the scent crusher products too
"They are who we thought they were"
You can dress a fat chick up, but you cant fix stupid
This video is pretty cheesy but the last 35 seconds show their products.
http://scentcrusher.com/about-scent-crusher/
"They are who we thought they were"
You can dress a fat chick up, but you cant fix stupid
Seems to work better in box stands although I won't sit a stand that has absolutely a dead wrong wind...
My brother and I both cut ours off to get out of the tree Wednesday and had deer blow us out that were 40-50 yds down wind..
The deer tend to be more calm and I think I see more of what I have on camera than before using it.. even in sitting the right wind..
Natural Born Killer Prostaff - Killing Tomorrow's Trophies Today...
TFC -"Be tough or get tough"
Conservation Permit Holder #5213
This one is better
"They are who we thought they were"
You can dress a fat chick up, but you cant fix stupid
These are pretty interesting tests, and the ozone products seem to help make a difference, at least for the few extra seconds that might make a difference.
The two questions that came to mind while reading the first trail-cutting test, and then the box tests are:
1. Was the trail-cutting test run with the walker wearing knee high rubber boots, or breathable leather, etc? Most importantly, I guess, is whether it would make a difference like we think it does, and how much?
2. In the box test, did the person hiding in the box wear a carbon filter face mask? If I'm not mistaken, our breath puts out more odor than our average hunting gear.
So, do rubber boots make a difference, and would a carbon filtered face mask of some sort help with "de-scented, non-ozonated clothes?
.
Foothills Golden Retriever Rescue
.
"Keep your powder dry, Boys!" ~ George Washington
"If I understood everything I said I'd be a genius." ~ 'Unknown'
Bookmarks