Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: DU to throw cash at landowners

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wateree, South Carolina
    Posts
    48,881

    Default

    Posted on Sun, Jul. 02, 2006
    OUTDOORS

    New leader has Ducks Unlimited expanding reach
    By PAT ROBERTSON
    Columnist

    THE NEW CHAIRMAN of South Carolina Ducks Unlimited is on a mission to conserve more habitat in the state, not just for waterfowl, but for all wildlife species, including a vast area east of Columbia.

    “Our goal is to get more volunteers for DU, get more dollars and preserve more habitat,” said Columbia attorney Bill Short, who took over the reins of SCDU in March from outgoing state chairman Mario Insabella of Spartanburg.

    SCDU was tops in the nation in dollars raised in the fiscal year that ended Friday. At the 69th annual National DU Convention in Phoenix last month Short accepted the Silver Award in the Pintail Flight, which is based on the number of members in the state organization.

    The state DU organization has nearly 14,000 members who raised more than $1 million for DU projects last year. SCDU has been a major force in conserving 120,597 acres of wildlife habitat in South Carolina alone. DU has protected more than 11 million acres on the North American Continent.

    Short said South Carolina DU will be a strong player in the Wetlands for Tomorrow Campaign — an effort to raise $1.7 billion over the next five years to save North America’s wetlands — which was launched this year by Ducks Unlimited and its foundation, the Wetlands America Trust.

    In South Carolina, Short will lead DU efforts for the Three Rivers Initiative, an ACE Basin-type project in the Midlands which will serve as a buffer to the Congaree National Park.

    The Three Rivers Initiative, which involves the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources and staff biologists from Ducks Unlimited’s South Atlantic Field Office in Charleston, will seek to preserve wildlife habitat in the area around the confluence of the Congaree and Wateree Rivers, which meet to form the Santee River, and for a considerable distance up those rivers.

    Part of the funding will come from Ducks Unlimited’s unique way of leveraging money for conservation projects. A bronze sponsorship, for instance, can preserve one acre of wildlife habitat. That level of membership costs $250, which can then be leveraged up to seven times and sometimes even more through DU’s partnerships. When it is leveraged seven times to around $1,750, that can be used to acquire conservation easements or, in some cases, buy the land outright.

    “We are 18 months into the Ducks Unlimited state license plate program and so far we’ve raised $50,000 net,” Short said. “We’ve not yet asked for an allocation from DNR because we want to get that figure up to $100,000. Then we can leverage that money ... and it can be spent in South Carolina.”

    The Three Rivers initiative will depend heavily on conservation easements. South Carolina already leads the nation in conservation easements established or partnered on by Ducks Unlimited, with six easements completed on 5,700 acres in the 2005-06 fiscal year and another 15,000 acres of easements in development this year in the state.

    DU has also restored almost 1,800 acres of public lands on the Santee National Wildlife Refuge, Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge and the DNR’s Broad River Waterfowl Management Area and it joined in the S.C. Partners Program to restore 750 acres of wetlands on private lands. About 5,000 acres of projects are planned for fiscal year ‘07 on the DNR’s Santee Coastal Reserve and the ACE Basin National Wildlife Refuge.

    Since 1985, DU has contributed approximately $3.8 million to protect, restore, and enhance over 103,000 acres in South Carolina.

    The organization also protects breeding habitat in northern states and Canada. Since 2000, South Carolina has provided $244,126 to conserve 33,108 acres and provide management assistance on 628,546 acres of waterfowl habitat in Ontario. Money from S.C. grassroots fundraising is also spent heavily in the Great Lakes/Atlantic Region and the Western Boreal Forest in Canada, areas that are critical nesting sites for birds that winter or travel through South Carolina in the fall.

    An attorney with Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A., Short is a past president and serves on the board of the Carolina Chapter of the Turnaround Management Association. He is a former President of the predecessor to the South Carolina Law Bankruptcy Association and is a certified specialist in Bankruptcy/Debtor-Creditor Law by the Supreme Court of South Carolina.

    An avid waterfowler who has a passion for and great understanding of the resource, Short said the key message is: “It is not necessarily about duck hunting. It’s about preserving habitat.”

    http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate...s/14950603.htm

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    48,016

    Default

    i can smell the negativity, JAB. why?

    120,000 acres preserved in SC.
    11,000,000 in North America.

    quick math tells me that 1% of the total land conserved is in SC. I think that's an appropriate amount, considering our geographic location in terms of breeding habitat.

    We still must preserve wetlands. Using leveraged DU dollars is THE way to go these days. They have the money, the "know-how", and the power. Why not let them take the ball and run with it?

    I, for one, applaud their efforts and will continue my support....
    Ugh. Stupid people piss me off.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wateree, South Carolina
    Posts
    48,881

    Default

    Negativity? Did you see where this money was targeted? I am ALLLLLLLL for it!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    DU needs to make some progress on isolated wetlands. Period. It is a legislative thing. I am disappointed that DU hasn't achieved more on this front. I may be ignorant of their progress with them but the destruction of isolated wetlands in the breeding grounds should be a higher priority than conserving wetlands.
    If you don't know me how could I offend you?

    If you are not a member of Delta or DU then you are living on duck welfare.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    48,016

    Default

    that was my next question...

    what would it take for Two Rivers to be put in an easement?

    we are talking about total control by the landowners, with the stipulation that the ponds remain ponds for.....ever.
    Ugh. Stupid people piss me off.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    48,016

    Default

    candor-i know what you're talking about, but understand the dificulty in getting Farmer John to put 2 acres in an easement when he can do the paperwork once and conserve his larger tract with larger wetlands.

    CRP is helping with some of the isolated wetlands in NoDak, that's for sure. Maybe DU could come up with something like Delta did with the "Adopt-a-Pothole" deal they did years' back?!
    Ugh. Stupid people piss me off.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wateree, South Carolina
    Posts
    48,881

    Default

    You know I agree with you on that Candor...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    2th...what I am stating is that you should not have to talk the farmer into putting it in an easement. It historically has been ill-LEGAL to develop wetlands. Then they had the isolated wetland ruling where DU didn't (IMO, because they lost) committ enough resources to the supreme court case. Now isolated wetlands are state issues and many states don't protect isolated farm areas.

    DU should be generating legislation in these areas to protect these bodies of water. Then their efforts should focus on conserving upland acerage arround these bodies...extensive upland acerage....
    If you don't know me how could I offend you?

    If you are not a member of Delta or DU then you are living on duck welfare.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    48,016

    Default

    complain to the farmer in ontario.
    Ugh. Stupid people piss me off.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    It is not the farmer it is the gubbament and DU that should get it done....
    If you don't know me how could I offend you?

    If you are not a member of Delta or DU then you are living on duck welfare.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wateree, South Carolina
    Posts
    48,881

    Default

    I wonder what many people are going to say about DU spending millions of dollars on the Wateree/Congaree rivers to pay mainly wealthy hunting clubs to conservation ease their duck ponds. Many of which were built with public monies to start with. Should be interesting to see what comes up when they get the ball rolling on this. Appraisers are getting ready to get BUSY...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    48,016

    Default

    candor--how can you blame the farmer for trying to make a living and use all the acreage he can?

    and learn to spell acreage.

    i'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just trying to see why you think we need MORE government involvement.
    Ugh. Stupid people piss me off.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    Originally posted by 2thDoc:
    candor--how can you blame the farmer for trying to make a living and use all the acreage he can?

    and learn to spell acreage.

    i'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just trying to see why you think we need MORE government involvement.
    <font size="-1" face="verdana,arial,helv">2th...While I misspelled acreage (fairy) if I could type slower for you to understand I would. I don't blame the farmer. I blame the govt. for not regulating isolated wetlands. I will say it again if you didn't hear me the third time. The govt. lost control of isolated wetlands when the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) took on the US Army Corps of Engineers and won in the US Supreme Court. Thereby there was no longer federal jurisdiction of isolated wetlands. Surely you are familiar with this??

    I am not big on govt control but certain things need it. Like wetlands....

    If you are not familiar with this lawsuit or historic regulations of wetlands you won't get what I am saying.
    If you don't know me how could I offend you?

    If you are not a member of Delta or DU then you are living on duck welfare.

  14. #14
    DUCKMAN is offline Moderator - Traveling Duck Assasin
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Bruner
    Posts
    1,562

    Default

    My only question is what is Toofer doing working on a Wednesday afternoon??????

    The SWANCC decision was one that surprised everyone and was not expected and you are right Candor - it now takes legislation in 50 states to cover what was once protected by Federal law and it is NOT getting done.

    DU has asked that no subsidies of any kind be paid for farmed classified wetlands that go through necessary periodic drought and they are getting some support on this, however intense studies over the last 5 years have shown that isolated, small wetlands with limited edge cover are death traps for nesting waterfowl and without large scale grasslands adjacent to these areas they serve little to no purpose and may even be a liability to waterfowl success. DU's new inititive looks at large landscape proposals over small isolated death traps. Good article in this months DU magazine. South Carolina is still a category III rating with DU and do not look for an influx of large funds in SC(even in the new 1.7 Billion Dollar plan!)There are more critical and more needed purchases/easements elsewhere.
    DUCKMAN<br /><br />\"If you love waterfowl - support DU and the Flyway Foundation!!\"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    I will have to get my hands on that article. Despite giving DU my membership dollars (through the banquet which I helped put on) they are ngeglecting to send me a magazine.
    If you don't know me how could I offend you?

    If you are not a member of Delta or DU then you are living on duck welfare.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •