Originally Posted by
scatter shot
Because you made it personal with your bullshit comment above. I stand by my response.
I'm glad that T's claim was settled to his satisfaction but still question why they would pay him more than a new trailer would cost. In his first post on this thread he said, "...trailer was fine before it was hit but I am sure State Farm will only pay me ACV of trailer which means it gonna cost me to replace it. I am fine with that if I need to do this"
So Lab, let me pose this question to you, or anyone else looking to buy a used trailer.
A- A brand new, double axle trailer cost $10,000. (guesstimate)
B- A similar, used trailer in good condition is for sale for $7000. Are you going to pay the seller new trailer price? ($10,000)
C- Or you can buy the same used trailer that has been damaged for $7000 and has $4000 worth of repairs needed for a total cost of $11,000.
Which deal are you going to take? It's a simple question.
And on another point, a question to the contractors on here that own and buy trailers as needed. What if one of your employees that is authorized to make purchases as needed, what would you think if the employee paid $11,000 for a used trailer that's only worth $7000 instead of buying a new trailer that only cost $10,000?
And a final point. If you as a customer, were to ask your insurance agent why you're rates keep going up +15% every year and he was to tell you, "... because we pay $11,000 for trailers that are only worth $7000."
Would you be happy with that response?
Sometimes common sense aint so common. (Lab Humper)
Once again, I'm glad this worked out for Tprice. No shade intended from here.
Bookmarks