I hear what you saying, but let me play devils advocate. Most of what we know or think we know about bullet performance is wrong. Ft pounds mean almost nothing, and tissue damage to the vitals and blood loss is what kills. There are numerous studies that prove that. All a bullet needs to do is be going fast enough to expand reliable and penetrate a few inches of tissue of inches of tissue and thin bone to kill a white tailed deer. Being able to accurately place that bullet is paramount. An accurate, light kicking rifle that fits the shooter is the best tool to do that with regardless of experience. I’ll argue an AR15 with an adjustable stock and it’s mild recoil meets all those parameters and then some. Especially the way most eastern deer are killed, from a stand, inside of 200 yds, with time to place an accurate shot. My BIL and my nephews are not experienced deer hunters. He inherited a savage bolt action 223 from his grandfather that he wanted to use for sentimental reasons. We zeroed it with Winchester 64 gr PP factory ammo, practiced shooting from a rest like they hunt from and discussed shot placement. They’re 100 % killing on deer over the past several with that Savage .223. All the deer I’ve shot with a .223 had a similar end, high kick and a short scramble before piling up. Everything in front of the diaphragm was wrecked. Blood trail didn’t matter because they didn’t go far, no matter if it was buck, doe or fawn.
Bookmarks