Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: Center for Disease Control

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    3,312

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    FROG LEVEL
    Posts
    23,813

    Default

    CDC is bidens pawn and owned by the Socialist Dems
    Gettin old is for pussies! AND MY NEW TRUE people say like Capt. Tom >>>>>>>>>/
    "Wow, often imitated but never duplicated. No one can do it like the master. My hat is off to you DRDUCK!"

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    18,444

    Default

    https://nclalegal.org/2021/03/ncla-f...on-moratorium/

    NCLA Files Class-Action Lawsuit to Put an End to CDC’s Lawless Nationwide Eviction Moratorium

    Mar 18, 2021 | COVID-19, Press Releases

    Washington, DC (March 18, 2021) – The laws of all fifty states provide the remedy of eviction through state processes to retake possession of a home you have rented out. But a national eviction moratorium issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2020 to “prevent” the spread of COVID-19 denies Plaintiffs the only lawful means available to them to evict a delinquent tenant—access to the courts. Today, the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group, filed a class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa on behalf of Asa Mossman of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and many other blameless housing providers left powerless against the CDC’s lawless order.

    NCLA argues that agencies have no inherent power to make law, and nothing in the relevant statutes or regulations gives CDC the power to issue an eviction moratorium order. Two federal courts in less than one week have agreed that CDC’s order is invalid. Last Wednesday the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio ruled in Skyworks, LTD., et al., v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, et al. that the nationwide moratorium exceeded the agency’s statutory authority. And earlier this week, the Western District of Tennessee ruled similarly in the case of Tiger Lily, LLC, et al. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al. NCLA had filed amicus briefs in both cases.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    18,444

    Default

    Further…


    CDC has yet to meet its obligation of showing that state actions were inadequate or that its eviction moratorium was necessary to stop the spread of COVID-19 as required by law. Nevertheless, the CDC order declares that anyone who violates the order faces up to $500,000 in fines or jail time, and housing providers like Plaintiffs here cannot pursue evictions. But if they default and lose their property, the banks can still evict! These Plaintiffs, most of whom are mom-and-pop housing providers, have been unexpectedly targeted by unelected agency bureaucrats, with no authority over housing or state courts, using a rule that only gives CDC authority to regulate sick livestock. The complaint also argues that the order violates the U.S. Constitution because CDC has not identified any act of Congress that confers upon it the power to halt evictions or preempt state landlord-tenant laws. The CDC’s order also impermissibly commandeers state courts and state officers to apply, enforce, and implement an unconstitutional federal law.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    3,319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scatter shot View Post
    That bitch needs to stay in her lane (CDC) and STFU.
    Do they have a lane? If they can make up any rule they want and they hold the opinions she is expressing, seems like they want to make it interesting.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •