Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 56

Thread: What will this mean for the lake/swamp/etc?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wateree, South Carolina
    Posts
    48,811

    Default What will this mean for the lake/swamp/etc?

    Suitor to buy state-owned Santee Cooper proposes cutting 700 jobs, acquiring debt

    BY JOSEPH BUSTOS AND MAAYAN SCHECHTER
    FEBRUARY 11, 2020 11:25 AM

    COLUMBIA, S.C.
    South Carolina lawmakers now have three options for deciding the fate of Santee Cooper, the state-owned utility that racked up $4 billion in debt associated with a failed nuclear construction project in Fairfield County.

    They can sell it, allow another company to manage it, or allow it to move forward as is with a reform plan of its own. Those options were outlined in a much-anticipated report, released Tuesday, that gave details of the three proposals to buy, manage or reform and allow Santee Cooper to remain publicly owned and operated.

    Driving the debate is the question of which plan will best protect Santee Cooper’s roughly 2 million customers from shouldering even more of the cost of the now-abandoned nuclear project, which will never generate power for them.

    But supporters of Santee Cooper also say the decades-old utility is worth saving and that keeping it state owned is the only way to ensure ratepayers are protected from rate hikes down the line.

    S.C. Gov. Henry McMaster, who was an early advocate of selling the utility, shared his favorite option Tuesday, shortly after the report’s release.

    Talking to reporters, the Columbia Republican said the General Assembly “must act quickly” to sell Santee Cooper, adding that the company with the top bid to buy the utility — Florida-based NextEra — “is a fine company.”

    “My strong recommendation is that Santee Cooper be sold. Otherwise, the citizens of our state and the ratepayers will be burdened with billions of dollars in debt with no way to pay for it,” he said.

    “The reactors are not being built. This debt was going to be paid through selling electricity made by those reactors. They’re not going to be built, so where are we going to get those billions of dollars to pay those loans off?” McMaster said.

    The options facing lawmakers were detailed in a more than 100-page report, put together by the state Department of Administration with help of outside consultants.

    The report named NextEra as the company to buy Santee Cooper, and Virginia-based Dominion Energy as the company to manage the utility, if lawmakers choose to sell or contract operations of Santee Cooper to another company.

    NextEra’s bid to purchase Santee Cooper includes taking on Santee Cooper’s debt, up to $6.859 billion and paying the state $500 million at closing in addition to other cost-defraying payments. It also promises a temporary rate freeze of four years for customers and nearly $1 billion in relief to customers through refunds or rate reductions. But NextEra also is proposing a 42% reduction in workforce — a loss of 705 people — as part of its bid.

    Dominion Energy provided the recommended bid for managing Santee Cooper, whose board would remain in place. Dominion would install senior level executives with management experience in Santee Cooper who would report to Santee Cooper’s chief executive officer. Dominion would receive reimbursement for those employee costs, but would not receive any management fees. Instead, the company would benefit from developing a partnership between the utility it owns in South Carolina — the former SCE&G — and Santee Cooper which is adjacent to Dominion’s holdings in many parts of the state.

    The report did not draw any conclusions about whether Dominion’s proposal would have any benefit for ratepayers.

    The winning proposals could pit the interests of two powerful investor-owned energy companies against each other — Dominion, which recently made a significant investment in the state’s energy sector, and NextEra, which has no holdings in the Palmetto State yet. Both are publicly traded, with stock listings on the New York Stock Exchange.

    While NextEra has no holdings in South Carolina, Dominion is the latest newcomer to South Carolina’s energy sector, having merged with then Cayce-based SCANA in January of last year. SCANA was the parent company of SCE&G, Santee Cooper’s senior partner in the failed nuclear project.

    Asked Tuesday about Dominion’s offer to manage Santee Cooper, McMaster said NextEra’s offer to buy the utility was “far superior.”

    At this point, it’s unclear from lawmakers, who only got the report once it became public Tuesday, what choice they will make.

    The House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee have 30 days to recommend a path forward of what to do with the utility.

    That process begins with a joint meeting on Thursday between the two committees where the Department of Administration will give a presentation to legislators about the report. The House Ways and Means Committee then plans to have discussions of the report beginning the last week of February.

    “Even with our 30-day time constraint, and the budget process picking up in committee, I am confident this ad-hoc committee will work with diligence and vigilance,” said House Ways and Means Chairman Murrell Smith. “I look forward to leading the next step forward on this incredibly important issue.”

    Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey, R-Edgefield, said he hopes to get to the Santee Cooper debate soon, but now is the time to read the report and hear from experts.

    “The only responsible position I think at this point is for people to digest what the details are of the report and then make a decision based on that information,” Massey said.

    A NUCLEAR FAILURE
    Lawmakers have been debating whether to sell Santee Cooper since 2017, when the utility and its partner, SCE&G, announced it was pulling the plug on a $9 billion plan to build two nuclear reactors at the V.C. Summer nuclear plant in Fairfield County.

    Santee Cooper, the junior partner owning 45% of the project, lost about $4 billion in the failed project and has about $3.6 billion in debt remaining. Dominion bought SCANA, SCE&G’s parent company, last year.

    Since shortly after the announcement, McMaster began pushing for the sale of Santee Cooper, saying the state should get out of the utility business. Critics of selling the utility have argued that keeping it state owned could protect the utilities customers against rising costs associated with the remaining debt.

    Santee Cooper in total has about $6.9 billion of debt, including the $3.6 billion associated with the nuclear project. The utility has 189,780 retail customers, and also provides electricity to 20 electric cooperatives, 13 cities, and more than 25 large industrial customers. In all, Santee Cooper directly or indirectly serves 2 million people in South Carolina.

    Santee Cooper also has been working to pay off its debt, recently reaching an agreement with Westinghouse, the former lead contractor on the nuclear construction project, on how to divide equipment at the site.

    Santee Cooper also has its own reform plan, put together under new leadership. President and CEO Mark Bonsall, a retired public power executive from Arizona, took the helm in July and already has announced efforts to lower debt and more toward more sustainable power sources.

    Reporter John Monk contributed.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,046

    Default

    Whoever buys it will drain the lake and then sell all the land to developers to house all these people coming in. At an average of 53 people a day in the low country, just think how many houses can be built once Lake Moultrie is dry land. Santee Cooper customers? Y'all will be sold to Dominion. That's how the VC Summers debt will be repaid. Only the river will remain.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    7,444

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moose843 View Post
    Whoever buys it will drain the lake and then sell all the land to developers to house all these people coming in. At an average of 53 people a day in the low country, just think how many houses can be built once Lake Moultrie is dry land. Santee Cooper customers? Y'all will be sold to Dominion. That's how the VC Summers debt will be repaid. Only the river will remain.

    Put down the pipe
    .
    80-20 Genaration

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    24,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moose843 View Post
    Whoever buys it will drain the lake and then sell all the land to developers to house all these people coming in. At an average of 53 people a day in the low country, just think how many houses can be built once Lake Moultrie is dry land. Santee Cooper customers? Y'all will be sold to Dominion. That's how the VC Summers debt will be repaid. Only the river will remain.
    More duck ponds. Maybe I'll get in on this round.

    Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,143

    Default

    Its gonna be the next catahoula...Home of the bread boxes and bleach jugs.We already got the sky busting part down and people claiming that spots were passed down through generations that belong to them on public grounds.
    Last edited by Coot_Commander; 02-11-2020 at 07:16 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ballard's Landing
    Posts
    15,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moose843 View Post
    Whoever buys it will drain the lake and then sell all the land to developers to house all these people coming in. At an average of 53 people a day in the low country, just think how many houses can be built once Lake Moultrie is dry land. Santee Cooper customers? Y'all will be sold to Dominion. That's how the VC Summers debt will be repaid. Only the river will remain.
    Where is the pre lakes draining explosion of development in Cainhoy, Cordesville, Moncks Corner, Cross, and Eutawville?

    Surely, pre-existing townships will develop first?
    Be proactive about improving public waterfowl habitat in South Carolina. It's not going to happen by itself, and our help is needed. We have the potential to winter thousands of waterfowl on public grounds if we fight for it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ballard's Landing
    Posts
    15,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Coot_Commander View Post
    Its gonna be the next catahoula...Home of the bread boxes and bleach jugs.We already got the sky busting part down and people claiming that spots were passed down through generations that belong to them on public grounds.
    I’ve lived here for 29 of my 36 years.

    I’ve duck hunted every square inch of both lakes and the high swamp, and not once have I heard someone utter the phrase.....”this was my daddy’s hole” as we battled it out over a particular piece of water.
    Last edited by BOGSTER; 02-11-2020 at 07:26 PM.
    Be proactive about improving public waterfowl habitat in South Carolina. It's not going to happen by itself, and our help is needed. We have the potential to winter thousands of waterfowl on public grounds if we fight for it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Clarendon County
    Posts
    4,591

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moose843 View Post
    Whoever buys it will drain the lake and then sell all the land to developers to house all these people coming in. At an average of 53 people a day in the low country, just think how many houses can be built once Lake Moultrie is dry land. Santee Cooper customers? Y'all will be sold to Dominion. That's how the VC Summers debt will be repaid. Only the river will remain.
    The sad thing about this idiotic statement is that people are dumb enough to think this would be a possibility.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Summerville
    Posts
    14,557

    Default

    If NextEra buys it, Winyah and Cross station will be gone in short order. NextEra is known for shutting down coal, not investing in it. NextEra bought Gulf Power last year and already has plans to shut down plant Crist in Pensacola. To my knowledge that’s the only coal plant they own and had plans to shut it down at the time of purchase. They’ll convert it to gas or put up a combined cycle. Either way, the plants will run at a fraction of the employees.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Summerville
    Posts
    14,557

    Default

    I feel certain that NextEra would keep the lakes and take on the Atlantic Sturgeon protection stuff. You should see what all NextEra does for the Mantaees in FL. That could be regulated by the state and fed though.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,970

    Default

    Anyone have a list of hydro reservoirs currently under the ownership / management of Nextera?
    Genesis 9;2

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Summerville
    Posts
    14,557

    Default

    They sold most if not all of their hydro. Most of it was in the north east. I’ll look and see what they still have.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4,992

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Strick9 View Post
    Anyone have a list of hydro reservoirs currently under the ownership / management of Nextera?
    https://www.fool.com/investing/gener...f-hydro-g.aspx

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Summerville
    Posts
    14,557

    Default

    Yes that. NextEra doesn't currently have any hydro in their portfolio. Natural Gas, Wind, Solar and Nuclear. What little bit of oil they have left is on the verge of being shut down as well.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Summerville
    Posts
    14,557

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Wateree Creek
    Posts
    1,732

    Default

    Big ass solar field. Then they can get rid of the stumps.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,970

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reeltight View Post
    Yes that. NextEra doesn't currently have any hydro in their portfolio. Natural Gas, Wind, Solar and Nuclear. What little bit of oil they have left is on the verge of being shut down as well.
    I see that now, so what in tarnation is their interest in predominant Hydro? What am I missing here?
    Genesis 9;2

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Florence, SC
    Posts
    2,575

    Default

    I read maybe the first paragraph. I conclude that the customers will stay have to pay the debt

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    FROG LEVEL
    Posts
    23,785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Strick9 View Post
    I see that now, so what in tarnation is their interest in predominant Hydro? What am I missing here?
    Land for 100.
    Gettin old is for pussies! AND MY NEW TRUE people say like Capt. Tom >>>>>>>>>/
    "Wow, often imitated but never duplicated. No one can do it like the master. My hat is off to you DRDUCK!"

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Summerville
    Posts
    14,557

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Strick9 View Post
    I see that now, so what in tarnation is their interest in predominant Hydro? What am I missing here?
    Customer base in a new territory.

    They will maintain the combustion turbines, convert coal to gas and list the hydro in their mix of renewables.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •