Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 53

Thread: New SC CWD Regs

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spartanburg
    Posts
    49,652

    Default New SC CWD Regs

    A good proactive step in the right direction.



    Discuss...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    13,499

    Default

    Gotta start somewhere I reckon
    "They are who we thought they were"

    You can dress a fat chick up, but you cant fix stupid

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    GreenHood
    Posts
    13,833

    Default

    Doesn’t bother me any
    Houndsmen are born, not made

    Quote Originally Posted by 2thDoc View Post
    I STAND WITH DUCK CUTTER!
    Quote Originally Posted by JABIII View Post
    I knew it wasn't real because no dogbox...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pawleys Island
    Posts
    35,933

    Default

    Acorns, corn and other crops. Find the does, bucks will be nearby.
    Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal? I wouldn't go so far as to call a dog filthy but they're definitely dirty. But, a dog's got personality. Personality goes a long way.


    You might take out a dozen before they drag you from your home and skull fuck you to death. Marsh Chicken 6/21/2013

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sullivan\'s Island
    Posts
    12,865

    Default

    I used doe pee in the past but I can't say whether it was net helpful or harmful to hunting success. For every time I had bucks obviously trailing the scent, I've had twice as many hunts on which I suspected the scent made deer more spooky.

    Even if it was magic, if it could be a vector for introducing CWD, it needs to be banned.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    49,817

    Default

    Like baiting.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wateree, South Carolina
    Posts
    48,810

    Default

    But especially like baiting...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    537

    Default





    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sullivan\'s Island
    Posts
    12,865

    Default

    Subject: UPDATED Response to PA Video & Dr. Frank Bastian's CWD "Cure" Claims



    Research claiming that bacteria are the causative agents of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies has never been reproduced despite extremely rigorous attempts to do so.
    In blind studies done by the University of Maryland School of Medicine, samples of brain material infected with scrapie, along with uninfected samples, were searched for Spiroplasma spp. and other common bacteria and bacteria-like structures using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification (PCR is a method widely used in molecular biology to make many copies of specific DNA segments). Researchers found no evidence that any eubacterium, including Spiroplasma or any other bacteria type, was consistently associated with scrapie-infected brain tissue, thus concluding that the “agent responsible for TSE disease cannot be a spiroplasma or any other eubacterial species.”

    Source:

    Absence of Spiroplasma or Other Bacterial 16S rRNA Genes in Brain Tissue of Hamsters with Scrapie

    Irina Alexeeva, Ellen J. Elliott, Sandra Rollins, Gail E. Gasparich, Jozef Lazar, Robert G. Rohwer

    Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 2006, 44 (1) 91-97; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.1.91-97.2006



    An extensive research project completed at Louisiana State University on the potential roles of Spiroplasma in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies found that following inoculation of Spiroplasma mirum into neonatal goats and five month-old white-tailed deer, none of the animals developed clinical signs or pathology seen in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. In this study, the bacteria were introduced to the animals intracerebrally, intravenous, or intradermally. Additionally, researchers conducting this study tested three species of Spiroplasma and found that they were susceptible to minimal dilutions of common laboratory disinfectants as well as heat sterilization of only 250°F for 15 minutes. In a wide array of other studies, samples of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy-infected material treated with similar sterilization methods were shown to remain infectious; thus indicating that other factors not related to bacteria result in the transmission and/or persistence of the disease.

    Source:

    French, Hilari Maree, "Characterization of Spiroplasma mirum and its role in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies" (2011).

    LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3012.



    Nearly all experimental examination of TSE-causing agents point to proteins at the infectious agent.
    The hallmark study of the prions’ role in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies was conducted by Dr. Stanley Prusiner who demonstrated that after adding enzymes that destroyed DNA and RNA to scrapie-infected brain material, the material remained infections. These enzymes would have damaged or destroyed bacteria present in the samples. However, when he adding protein-neutralizing enzymes to the scrapie-infected brain material, it’s infectivity plummeted. Thus, he demonstrated that the causative agent of the disease was most likely protein based, not bacterial-based. It should be noted that Prusiner’s work earned a Nobel Prize due to its rigor and reproducibility by other researchers.

    Source:

    Prusiner SB. (1982). Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science. 9;216(4542):136-44.



    Artificially synthesized prions have shown to be capable of causing prion disease.
    To rule out the role of unidentified substances as disease causative agents in samples of infectious tissues, researchers successfully created a “clean” synthetic version of the scrapie prion that was capable of infecting mice.

    Source:

    Legname G, Baskakov IV, Nguyen HB, et al. (2004). Synthetic Mammalian Prions. Science. 7;305:673-676.





    Nick Pinizzotto | President & CEO

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    where you aren't
    Posts
    2,287

    Default

    Ban baiting.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,707

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRR View Post
    Ban baiting.
    But how will people be able to successfully kill deer if you ban corn???

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Fairfield
    Posts
    186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gone South View Post
    But how will people be able to successfully kill deer if you ban corn???
    Hell its easier to kill big deer with out corn.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Knoxville, TN/Bryson City, NC
    Posts
    1,154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRR View Post
    Ban baiting.
    Ain't no sport in it if you aren't shooting a deer off a corn pile
    "some men are mere hunters, others are turkey hunters"-Archibald Rutledge

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    3,542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRR View Post
    Ban baiting.

    I’m with this guy.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    7,444

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRR View Post
    Ban baiting.
    If that the case it should include food plots
    .
    80-20 Genaration

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Summerville
    Posts
    5,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Duckman#1 View Post
    If that the case it should include food plots
    I agree with this statement

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    13,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Duckman#1 View Post
    If that the case it should include food plots
    And acorn trees, and ban deer from making scrapes
    "They are who we thought they were"

    You can dress a fat chick up, but you cant fix stupid

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    where you aren't
    Posts
    2,287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheVisorGuy View Post
    And acorn trees, and ban deer from making scrapes
    Corn is portable.......oak trees and scrapes are not.

    Acorn trees really, use the words "oak trees" in public next time.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    7,444

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRR View Post
    Corn is portable.......oak trees and scrapes are not.

    Acorn trees really, use the words "oak trees" in public next time.
    What does portable have to do with it ? It’s about the concentration of deer. You know how many bucks will use a single scrape ? I have trail cam pics of at least 5 buck on the same scrape in 2 days
    .
    80-20 Genaration

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    4,304

    Default

    I bet CWD is already here in SC and we just don't know it yet.
    Listen to your elders. Not because they are always right but because they have more experiences of being wrong.

    "We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give" Sir Winston Churchill

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •