View Poll Results: Bill Should Say

Voters
144. You may not vote on this poll
  • Killing of tame birds only on release sights, no limits, no wild bird harvest

    87 60.42%
  • Killing of release and wild birds on release sights, abiding by federal limits set

    16 11.11%
  • Release sights release birds at time and date of hunt into hunt grounds.

    39 27.08%
  • Status Quo

    2 1.39%
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 67

Thread: Released Mallard Hunts

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swampshooter View Post
    How will said ponds distinguish wild from tame.
    That's the point. Folks that do these shoots can't tell the difference.
    DILLIGAF

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Edisto River
    Posts
    653

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hogg View Post
    That's the point. Folks that do these shoots can't tell the difference.
    Exactly why I bring the point up. Most hunters in general can't tell the difference. Hell to be honest, I'm not sure I could distinguish a wild mallard from a tame one 100% of the time.
    Quote Originally Posted by Buckin Bronco View Post
    Yep. I have a border collie mix that is smarter than most of the people on this site.
    The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    2,794

    Default

    I am voting for number 3.... Reason is I am under the impression it is like a tower shoot. Few things I would like to see added to the possible regulation.
    All birds purchased must be reported and all birds harvested.
    Have to stay within the set season dates.
    No wild birds allowed.
    Would have to set a limit to amount of birds per hunter per shoot but main reason would make sure that each release is controlled and systematically almost 100% of the birds accounted for as even the most novice hunters can hit a flying chicken.
    Would also have to come up with areas this is allowed within the state as to discourage wild birds from being taken.

    A lot of things to consider when coming up with new regs that may not come to pass as some of the guys voting have skin in the game but I feel a tower like shoot is the only way to really regulate the amount of birds released vs birds taken and only allowing this in certain areas as to regulate the chance a wild bird is taken. If we don't allow them in areas that are known for attracting wild populations of waterfowl the chances for harvesting wild birds I would assume would go way down! None the less a lot to consider and discuss.
    “Duck hunting gives a man a chance to see the loneliest places …blinds washed by a rolling surf, blue and gold autumn marshes, …a rice field in the rain, flooded pin-oak forests or any remote river delta. In duck hunting the scene is as important as the shooting.” ~ Erwin Bauer, The Duck Hunter’s Bible, 1965

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Certified Piedmonster
    Posts
    8,863

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swampshooter View Post
    How will said ponds distinguish wild from tame.
    They wont. They will shoot whatever comes in and the "guide" will say "leave those two in the woods...."
    Last edited by SCswampCAT; 03-08-2019 at 12:25 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunwannabe View Post
    Man is merely a two legged locust, devouring wild lands, developing and prostituting wildlife and fisheries under the guise of "use of the resource" for tremendous profit and moving on. Will it ever end?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wateree, South Carolina
    Posts
    48,881

    Default

    I love the "guide" reference. I have met a few of those soyboy faggots calling themselves duck hunting guides around Rimini. The ones I met couldn't call a flock of migratory waterfowl into the trees at Lower Vallier if their very lives depended on it...

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SPARTANBURG
    Posts
    2,359

    Default

    Is there no way to get an option for a complete ban on releasing waterfowl into the wild ? I know it would be an uphill battle unless usfws would get on board , but that would really be the only way to really cure the problem .
    If it aint got 8 toes & a green head,it aint a duck.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    2,153

    Default

    I voted one but I think a combination of 1 and 3 would accomplish what the state needs

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyTownsend View Post
    I voted one but I think a combination of 1 and 3 would accomplish what the state needs
    You make an excellent point.
    DILLIGAF

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    3,424

    Default

    voted option 3.
    but with a stipulation that the hunt "sight" be enclosed, ensuring no entry of wild fowl or released birds escape.
    (forgive me if this is how tower hunts operate, its public land only for me)


    “Muh butts been wiped.” TheBigGuy
    “Poor kids are just as bright and talented as white kids.” PedoPete, Esq.
    “Let’s go Brandon, I agree!” former Vice President Joe Biden
    “Shower time, Ashley.” NotAndyTaylor

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    In the middle of it
    Posts
    8,166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyTownsend View Post
    I voted one but I think a combination of 1 and 3 would accomplish what the state needs
    Bingo

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    So. The 861 people that have viewed the thread without voting are:
    (a) too stupid to realize Rep. Lowe put an offer to introduce a bill off a SC Ducks poll
    (b) tammie hunter
    (c) suffering from apathy and nonfeasance
    DILLIGAF

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,621

    Default

    I've checked in a time or two to see where the poll sits. I suppose that counts as a view each time?

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wateree, South Carolina
    Posts
    48,881

    Default

    I assume so, CurLee...

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    49,888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DUCK BUSTER 68 View Post
    Is there no way to get an option for a complete ban on releasing waterfowl into the wild ? I know it would be an uphill battle unless usfws would get on board , but that would really be the only way to really cure the problem .
    I quit reading right here as this is the only choice.

    I would even go so far as to push for getting ESA protection for Mottled ducks as that’s the only way to usurp the bullshit we have in Columbia.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,204

    Default

    What is ESA?

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    49,888

    Default

    Endangered Species Act.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Summerville, SC
    Posts
    7,325

    Default

    I'd vote 1 and 3 and expect the legislation to pass.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    536

    Default

    I vote 3 in hopes of eliminating wild birds being drawn to tamie ponds. Even if they can’t shoot the wild birds, the live decoy effect will still be a factor in drawing birds away from those not hunting chickens.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Bowman
    Posts
    6,433

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tater View Post
    I quit reading right here as this is the only choice.

    I would even go so far as to push for getting ESA protection for Mottled ducks as that’s the only way to usurp the bullshit we have in Columbia.
    Surely you jest...
    cut\'em

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JABIII View Post
    I assume so, CurLee...
    I am not used to your modern ways.
    DILLIGAF

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •