Regulating Dog Hunting

[Duck cutter]

Some similar arguments going on in California and Florida right now. I think both states passed laws (maybe not on books yet but going into effect next year) requiring tracking/corrective collars on dogs. In California PETA is now sueing the state on the basis that these device give hunters and unfair advantage over the quarry.

[whitty]

Every year it’s the same thing. Some for and some against and a bunch of complaining. Carry on women.

[uga_dawg]

And the usual suspects trying to claim the title of tallest midget.

[Timsmith]

Watch out , bunch of folks bought those QMDA soybeans, so a trophy 150” will be shot this year, in a Atlanta subdivision

[Bigtimber2]

i just cant believe yall let Ghetto bait you on a years old thread....

I caught my two target fish.

[Bigtimber2]

And some trash fish.

[Bigtimber2]

Watch out , bunch of folks bought those QMDA soybeans, so a trophy 150” will be shot this year, in a Atlanta subdivision

Will a bow gut shot and recovery on 3/4 acres.

[uga_dawg]

looks like you snagged yourself in the ass considering you have 10 posts in this thread today.

[b-stick]

Ban cry baby still hunters

[Duck cutter]

And fwiw, I could not imagine turning out a hunting dog of any kind these days without having a tracking collar on them

[w33kender]

In other words you have zero argument to agriculture being a $42 billion industry in SC and no comparison to our beloved nuisance the whitetail deer and sport deer hunting..... got it. The only thing you have is stick to naming turkeys. Also for the record I don't shoot small deer so I'm not in the shoot everything crowd. Most farmers I know don't shoot little bucks either so good try on that as well. I don't like be regulated on something that has worked for over 75 years in this state for a few QDMA members that are under the delusion that SC will produce 150 inch deer on the reg. Because if you believe that, you sir are a dumbass

150" deer was never the point.

[PJ1012]

150" deer was never the point.

Yes it was. That was the underlying factor QDMA was looking at. If it wasn’t what was? And if you say a falling deer herd I’m going to laugh in your face

[2thDoc]

let me just give you some advice:
Dont talk in absolutes like you have been. You will be wrong. Often.

but i'm not about to dive into this silly thread much farther.

[Bigtimber2]

Less than 250 bucks ever scored in SC netted over 150”. A change was not made for 0.0001% of the deer population.

[PJ1012]

Less than 250 bucks ever scored in SC netted over 150”. A change was not made for 0.0001% of the deer population.

Then what was is for then? I'll sit back and wait for the bullshit to spew out your mouth

[Bigtimber2]

Enforceable deer limits.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[PJ1012]

Enforceable deer limits.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And we needed these limits because.....?

[Bigtimber2]

Wildlife and fish are a limited natural resource.

[PJ1012]

Wildlife and fish are a limited natural resource.

I was hoping you’d go down this BS road. There’s is nothing limited about the whitetail deer in the LC. Next bullshit excuse

[Catdaddy]

I was hoping you’d go down this BS road. There’s is nothing limited about the whitetail deer in the LC. Next bullshit excuse

Some people thought the same thing about the Passenger Pigeon. How did that end up?