Abortion is murder
Women should have the right to choose
Abortion should only be allowed in medical or criminal cases
I do understand that. And in that type of household situation, I don't think the parents should be granted the privilege of bringing a child into this world.
In that instance, I'm just saying that parents are often irresponsible, and provided the opportunity to abort, they may have done so. But, since they can't, and they are slack, they just treat the kid as another paycheck.
Sent from my S9+ using Tapatalk
A potential outcome of unprotected sex, is pregnancy. If someone is not willing to take responsibility of that outcome, then they shouldn’t have sex. (For the sake of argument, we will remove rape and medical concernsfrom the table, seeing as only a very small number of abortions fall into those categories anyway)
I think he was trying to say that just because someone gets pregnant and doesn't want the baby, they shouldn't get the choice to abort it. They made their choice to have that baby when they had sex, protected or not. They should take responsibility for their actions and raise the child the best they can, or let someone more fit raise it.
Or he could be saying that the baby can dictate their own life once they are old enough, and their circumstances surrounding their birth do not dictate their quality of life later on because we live in a country with the most opportunity afforded to individuals that ever existed.
It's one of the two, and I agree with the first one more than I agree with the second one. I'll let wskinner elaborate more on it if I am off in any way.
Abortion is the biggest civil rights issue of our life time. Pro-Slavery people where blind to freedom for all Americans. Pro-choice people are blinded to the right to life. I pray we look back in 50 years and see abortion in the same light as slavery.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Last edited by Bigtimber2; 09-05-2018 at 11:31 AM.
Him. Whoops! The condom broke.
Her. Its ok i am on birth control also as our backup.
Two weeks later no period. Were they wanting a kid? Were they being responsible and trying to avoid pregnancy? They don’t want children and at this point it is an unidentifiable round clump of cells. What’s the call? Justify your response without religion and take into account that it is not developed at all.
If a man is alone in the woods, says something, and a woman does not hear, is he still wrong?
Bipartisan usually means that a larger-than-usual deception is being carried out. —George Carlin
Common sense is not a gift. It's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone else who doesn't have it.
Could you come up a more unlikely scenario? To answer your question, that is a risk when using birth control and it is taught in sex Ed, so again, personal responsibility. If you are willing to roll the dice that your protection will work, then be prepared if it doesn’t.
Last edited by wskinner; 09-05-2018 at 11:42 AM.
Absolutely agree. No telling whether someone is pregnant or not the next day. The free market will determine when that happens. You can order the morning after pill off amazon now. Not sure it does much good when it arrives two or three days after you had sex; although, it does afford the individual user the privacy and convenience of purchasing it ahead of time, which is fantastic.
That's not really how personal responsibility should work.
Why should I be the one to bear the responsibility of a child's life? If I can decide on how to raise him, treat him, parent him, then I should be afforded the right to terminate a non-viable fetus...a potential child who will have to endure an unnurturing household, one that makes a child wish they were dead...
Personal responsibility is like getting a speeding ticket, owning up to it, and paying the fine.
It shouldn't be equated to bringing an unwanted life into this world and having to care for it for 18 years.
Sent from my S9+ using Tapatalk
Last edited by USMCsilver; 09-05-2018 at 11:43 AM.
If a man is alone in the woods, says something, and a woman does not hear, is he still wrong?
Bipartisan usually means that a larger-than-usual deception is being carried out. —George Carlin
Common sense is not a gift. It's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone else who doesn't have it.
But why is that the child's fault? If someone who is unfit to be a mother, has sex and gets pregnant, are we not punishing the child, who had know choice in the matter of being created, by bringing it into a shitty existence?
I swear, its almost like some of you are ok with children suffering as long as they aren't killed in the womb. There simply aren't enough good people in the world to take care of all the children born into shitty situations, and I'm talking real situations, not a trailer home and a dad who drinks. I'm talking abuse, kids that never receive an ounce of love, children born to drug addicts who never show them an ounce of compassion. Those children grow into adults and live with that pain forever. Sure, some of them manage to over come it, but I'd be willing to bet that many, many more suffer for the rest of their lives because of it. Now who are we being fair too?
"This is My commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you." John 15:12
"Strive for peace with everyone, and for the holiness without which no one will see the Lord." Hebrews 12:14
That's easy, we should be fair to the life that had no choice in the matter, and give them a chance at living their lives. The world is a shitty place, and some people get a tough draw. Look at nature all around us to see evidence of that.
Giving dumbasses the choice to harm and cause pain to their inconvenient fetus is not, nor will ever be, the answer. Inalienable rights dictate this.
Bookmarks