Abortion is murder
Women should have the right to choose
Abortion should only be allowed in medical or criminal cases
So you think ripping a fetus from a womans womb isnt brutal. Sit and watch your wife cry her eyed out hysterically waiting for the doctor to cone do a dnc after she has lost her third child in a row and when all she wants is a child to love and cant. I promise you there are plenty that “want” these kids that you speak of. Maybe tgey should make adoption easier to make happen tgan abortion. Maybe insurance could help pay for it like it does for abortions.
"Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world's great flood and runs over rocks from the basement of time. On some of the rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs.
I am haunted by waters" Norman Maclean.
My corner is realistic.
My beliefs are what they are.
I honestly believe that an unwanted child doesn't have 50/50 odds of beating the chances of leading a happy, fulfilling life.
Children deserve the right to full jubilation for the developmental years of early life. An unwanted child, again, for the most part, does not receive that right.
Sent from my S9+ using Tapatalk
I have a soft spot for children. It's adults I hate. It's a daily struggle of judging etc. Many children live sad & miserable lives. That's because of adults. I don't see how a parent can have a child & still be a "lowlife".
Happiness is all in perspective
I vote to kill the breeders & let the babies live.
.
"Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world's great flood and runs over rocks from the basement of time. On some of the rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs.
I am haunted by waters" Norman Maclean.
If you don't believe the same things as me then you are wrong.
I'm with USMCsilver.
Is it unfair to kill a fetus without it being able to advocate for its on life? Sure. But it is also unfair to bring a child into this world and into a home where the baby won't be cared for, won't be treated properly, won't be seen as anything else but a check from the govt.
At some point we have to get over the feel good notion of every child could have a perfect adopted family. There are plenty of kids in the system now waiting to get a "good" home. Others being molested or mistreated in "good" homes. We are talking about a human being that from the time it is born will develop mentally and physically based on it's circumstances. I can't condone bringing a child into this earth knowing good and well that it will go to bed each night feeling unwanted, feeling mistreated, not being loved.
There are worse things in life than dying. Sometimes a death without suffering could be the better thing.
"This is My commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you." John 15:12
"Strive for peace with everyone, and for the holiness without which no one will see the Lord." Hebrews 12:14
I'm a realist. Not an idealist.
Look at crime statistics, poverty levels, single parent households...
Do you think it is fair for these children to be birthed into households just because their mother wants more government assistance?
Do you think that society, as a whole, on a global scale, would not be slightly improved if all children were actually wanted? Of course it would be! But that is a fairlytail.
People suck. They continue to suck.
Realism vs. idealism. In the end, realism trumps all.
Sent from my S9+ using Tapatalk
I'm honestly speechless at this point. Determining who gets to live and die over what might happen. Just wow.
I was born in a trailer to two parents who at the time smoked, partied and drank heavily. What were my odds?
Bookmarks