Stripa, I sure don't mind, but that will be my huge spreadsheet compiled over the years. PM your email address and I'll send it, but it may need some explanation once you have it in front of you.
Stripa, I sure don't mind, but that will be my huge spreadsheet compiled over the years. PM your email address and I'll send it, but it may need some explanation once you have it in front of you.
Simple. SAFETY. Sitting behind/near a representation of a legal male turkey is unsafe. I'm completely convinced that getting rid of gobbler/Jake decoys would greatly reduce the harvest.
As a byproduct, Matt Busbice would have to keep his thunder clucker and Barnett double beard crossbow in another state.
Them that don't know him won't like him, and them that do sometimes won't know how to take him
He ain't wrong, he's just different, and his pride won't let him do things to make you think he's right
They don't put Championship rings on smooth hands
I'm just not convinced that it would make much difference. There are hunters that would not kill a bird, or as many, but they just might not hunt. Those birds are probably vulnerable to other hunters in different ways. The number of birds killed using them is not the same as the number fewer that would be killed without them. Some old-timers might feel about the same way about hen decoys and they are just about necessary for many "field birds". Still, the increase in their use simply hasn't resulted in a decrease in effort required to kill a turkey anywhere, I wouldn't say.
Dayum, there is nothing in my view of turkey hunting that makes me want to defend them; it's just that there is nothing that lets me conclude that outlawing them would make a difference to the resource. It might remove some hunters and, indirectly, improve the quality-of-the-hunt, but that doesn't/wouldn't affect the total number harvested to any real degree. I simply don't see it.
There are surely other issues that are similar in perspective, including the season opening dates. Let's get back to that one in particular. Strutters, etc., deserves a thread of its own, I suppose.
I agree, but you know as well as I do that ain't gonna happen. As time has gone by the skill level of hunters have gone down down down. No one has to work as hard anymore. Want to kill a deer? Go throw corn on the ground and sit it. Want to kill a duck? Plant corn and flood it. Want to kill a turkey? Go buy you a gay little tent to sit in and put a strutter out front. Hunting is too popular right now for the right things to be done to benefit our wildlife. Instead, lets make it easier for the ones who have no skill, don't scout, or do anything during the off seasons, let's make it where they can kill stuff too
Now, I'm with you and that is EXACTLY what we have extended into the setting of season dates. Actually, it's what the legislature THOUGHT it was doing. The point of the data is that it didn't work out in terms of hunter success by any measure. It DID add more hunters and more Days Hunted to the resource, though. My position is that we need to let the management of the resource and Quality-of-the-Hunt speak up and undo that populist approach that helps neither the birds nor the hunters.
Last edited by Tuffy; 04-09-2017 at 01:08 PM.
For what it's worth: These are what I come up with as the percentage of Hunters that killed one or more birds from 2007-2016. It's not going up and the ups and downs that are in it are more easily explained by population/reproduction and/or season length. Even weather... but I can't see the strutter trend in it or anything that could be it.
29.7% 20.9% 19.7% 21.9% 22.3% 25.8% 19.4% 19.2% 18.9% 20.5%
R.I.P SFC Spencer Kohlheim.
Suicide is never a good thing but I understand.
Thank you for your service to our nation.
I agree, but to most people, the quality of the hunt is determined by one thing and one thing only? Did you kill anything? Perfect example, I took a young boy 2 weeks ago. We watched 2 birds gobble their heads off, strut, and carry on for 45 minutes about 70 yards out until he couldn't hold his pee anymore. Birds were with hens and nothing we did made any difference, they could have been killed, just not at that moment. I thought it was a great hunt, but talking to his dad later in the week I could tell the young boy didn't look at it quite like I did. He told his dad, "nah, we didn't do anything." I realize he is young, but, that's the mentality of a lot of people. With the exception of maybe ducks, game is way too plentiful now for some people to realize that hunting isn't just killing
Last edited by jevans; 04-09-2017 at 01:29 PM.
Okay. Send me an email address. I'm stepping out for a while but will send it when I return.
Run season statewide from 4/1-5/1
3 bird limit
1 bird per day
Tags $10 each for residents and $25 each for oos.
While we are at it, let's get rid of male decoys and TSS and force people how to learn how to hunt turkeys again.
Yes, the last satement was sarcastic. I'm totally against restricting the way and individual hunts. Heck, it would suit me to make turkey hunting bow hunting only but again that's just my opinion.
There's no doubt that as a whole, the turkey population in SC is down. I can't say for sure what needs to be done but I feel like shortening the season is a viable option. I think that charging for tags might cut out some of "because I can" hunters.
Last edited by thunderchicken; 04-09-2017 at 01:54 PM.
Tuffy, do you have a breakdown of how many of these birds are jakes?
Tags should absolutely not be free, especially on public lands where management should be paid for.. Its an out that has been used against me by the very agencies in charge of wildlife management.
Genesis 9;2
What is the chance we can get a question about decoy usage on the turkey survey? For all its faults it is the only real source of statewide data we have.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Where are these numbers of dead turkeys coming from?
.... but they are cheap pearls. "It's a wicked dollar but I give it gladly."
Bookmarks