You're missing my point. They aren't getting prosecuted because it's being overlooked. The evidence is there in the open. LE just looks the other way. If someone would get the go ahead to "investigate" this, it would be a blood bath as long as the right judge saw it.
You mean, I could have trolled with this little guy during duck season and killed "real" ducks over him? And the SC GW's and Feds wouldn't have a problem with it???
I probably could have trained him to lure ducks all the way to the blind!
Do The Catfish Pond folks need a bonafide "duck whisperer"? Now that they no longer use "natural decoys" they could advertise that they have a "Duck Whisperer"!
Listen to your elders. Not because they are always right but because they have more experiences of being wrong.
"We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give" Sir Winston Churchill
Lost cause....let it got
The GWs are in in it, but they are a political animal whose supervisor(s) cannot exist with bad publicity....the sort of bad publicity which would result by putting a bug in the right newsperson's ear (that influential are blatantly breaking the law, an simultaneously acting unethically).
Either find the right newsperson or write a compelling editorial. Either way, publicity and bad press are your only routes.
Last edited by buckfarmer; 11-16-2015 at 11:14 PM.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Delta in a nutshell: Breeding grounds + small wetlands + big blocks of grass cover + predator removal + nesting structures + enough money to do the job= plenty of ducks to keep everyone smiling!
"For those that will fight for it...FREEDOM...has a flavor the protected shall never know."
-L/Cpl Edwin L. "Tim" Craft
No Balls!
You've got one life. Blaze on!
I get your point. But you have to realize the burden of proof lies on the state. And in this case you can't just show up to court with a video of a bunch of ducks flying around a bunch of other ducks on a pond and prove they are knowingly hunting over tamies in order to shoot wild ducks. That doesn't prove anything other than some guys were shooting ducks. Especially when the defendants are well heeled and well connected members of the community with lawyers. The juice ain't worth the squeeze in this case. It's easier to sit at the ramp writing tickets to every "hey bo" that comes in over the limit on mergansers and egrets.
Last edited by marsh chicken; 11-17-2015 at 07:28 AM.
That published advertisement would be good to have as evidence. I remember someone defending the practice here once. He welcome a live decoys charge and was prepared to defend it in court.
Somebody on the prosecutor's side has made a decision that the case may be un-winnable(sp).
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Last edited by Catdaddy; 11-17-2015 at 08:20 AM.
I can't tell you how many times someone has told me, "We don't shoot the tamies" and "They just help bring in the wild birds" and "They help attract the ringnecks" and "We kill the tamies at the end of the year when the season goes out, those days are really fun" and my favorite "We have the tame birds for the kids to shoot at" There is piles and piles of proof out there and people willing to testify.
Will someone publish a list of these tamie operations? I can name 4-5 offhand but I'd like to hear what other operations people are talking about
Aint no way I would ever take responsibility for baiting.... They better have video of me putting out bait with a time stamp or the glove don't fit you better acquit.
None the less hunting over released birds is hunting over live decoys. Im with Bog something needs to be done, I am tired of the tamie ponds getting a free pass to break the law whole us common folk get raked over the coals for every little thing.
“Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it.”
― Norman Maclean
Bookmarks