3 vs 3.5 inch shells

[ziggy]

i am going in between buying a benelli super black eagle and the m2. I am wondering if the 3.5 balistics are worth spending the extra money for the super black eagle

[Duck Nitz]

I'll say that if you plan on shooting alot of steel, get the 3.5. Especially if you like to shoot Canada geese, Specklebellies etc. The SBE 2 will give you the knockdown needed with steel in the #2's, #1's, BB, and BBB in 3.5" at good distances.
I would say that if you are into primarily ducks, the M2 would be the better choice. If you can afford to shoot the Tungsten-Iron loads on the market, you should have it covered with the M2. Glad to hear you are shooting the inertia-recoil variety. Good luck with your choice.

[BugBuster]

Ziggy, if you take a look at the stoeger auto shotguns they are only $349 camo in 3 inch. I am not a stoeger fan but the gun is the old benelli m1,l inertia and all. They bought benelli's old machines. I looked at one the other day, that is a heck of a deal.

stoegerindustries.com

[Gander]

It can't hurt to have more shell choices. Get the 3 1/2 incher.

[ziggy]

alright yall thanks i primarily shoot ducks and turkeys so i think that the m2 will be the one that i go with. thanks

[SCSeaCraft]

31/2 shells are for skybusting rubberheads.

[Turd Ferguson]

get the skybuster- you cant go wrong

[SCSeaCraft]

And Magnaport it your hunting buddies will be jealous.DEAF,but jealous.

[Gander]

In light of recent events, I'd rather make them blind, will porting do that?