Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Nikon 3100 Lens

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Camden, SC
    Posts
    811

    Default Nikon 3100 Lens

    I need suggestions for a lens to photograph outdoors. Mostly would like to photograph deer so I need a lens for longer distance photographs and possibly lower light. What should i get and where to get it? I am a novice and know very little about this and any help would be appreciated. Thanks all.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Buck Swamp
    Posts
    4,064

    Default

    research alot, glass means more than the camera in most cases.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Camden, SC
    Posts
    811

    Default

    Any help is appreciated.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    24,581

    Default

    You better have several 1000 bucks if you want to do that kind of shooting.

    Seriously what is your budget? If it's less than 1000 bucks you better set other goals for what you want to shoot.
    You've got one life. Blaze on!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Camden, SC
    Posts
    811

    Default

    Not overly concerned with the budget. Probably will be a mutual Christmas gift for my wife and I. Seen on internet I can get a 500mm Bower manual focus lens for less than $200. I'm not trying to achieve the level of photography that Squatty has reached but would like to take decent pictures of wildlife. So I assume a simple telephoto would be sufficient. Please keep suggestions coming.
    Thanks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    3,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Time View Post
    Mostly would like to photograph deer
    +

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Time View Post
    Seen on internet I can get a 500mm Bower manual focus lens for less than $200.

    =

    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn View Post
    Nobody ever became a hero in a comfortable setting. Sometimes you got to nut it up and do work.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Mt. Pleasant, SC
    Posts
    1,545

    Default

    "Truth, is treason, in the empire of lies"


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    24,581

    Default

    I need a lens for longer distance photographs and possibly lower light.
    You won't have the capability to do what you want to do in your statement above for $200. Lenses are essentually like a good scope on a rifle or a extremely nice set of binoculars. The cheaper you go on the product the cheaper the results. Same for the photos. While you may get a photograph the quality won't be what you may have invisioned. Be very careful when purchasing knock off lenses. What you think you maybe getting is not going to produce the results of a name brand high quality lens that shoots the same distances.

    Good luck.
    You've got one life. Blaze on!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Camden, SC
    Posts
    811

    Default

    Thanks for the help Squatty.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Second that...I bought a cheap 500mm Sigma for 300 bucks used and in good light, it was fairly sharp. BUT, in lower light levels when it counts, that cheap sigma failed miserably. I am a photographer and I have half a dozen lenses, but I still lack a quality super zoom because of price. I the cheapest one you can get away with and get good quality shots is this one... Nikkor AF VR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED. For good distant wildlife lenses in low light, this is still not the best, but is the best on a budget. It retails at about 1600-1800 bucks. Remember too...when shooting at distance in low light you really cannot shoot in auto mode. you will need to toggle your main three: shutter speed, aperture, and ISO sensitivity. This is mostly a trial and error deal. Good luck!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by finnaddict View Post
    Second that...I bought a cheap 500mm Sigma for 300 bucks used and in good light, it was fairly sharp. BUT, in lower light levels when it counts, that cheap sigma failed miserably. I am a photographer and I have half a dozen lenses, but I still lack a quality super zoom because of price. I the cheapest one you can get away with and get good quality shots is this one... Nikkor AF VR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED. For good distant wildlife lenses in low light, this is still not the best, but is the best on a budget. It retails at about 1600-1800 bucks. Remember too...when shooting at distance in low light you really cannot shoot in auto mode. you will need to toggle your main three: shutter speed, aperture, and ISO sensitivity. This is mostly a trial and error deal. Good luck!
    Nikon is supposed to redo this lens too. I am hoping they will come out with a good one....FYI-don't waste your money on that bower. I would recommend finding a used one first. If you are serious about getting one. I know the guy I sold mine too is interested in selling it. You also realize that a super zoom is bulky, heavy, and not very practical to take around. he realized that real quick. Nice to have, but I spent my money on other lenses that are more practical.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Camden, SC
    Posts
    811

    Default

    Finnaddict,

    Thank you for the suggestions. I may be satisfied with just long distance pictures rather than lower light. I generally take a very simple camera or even my telephone to take pictures of what I see while hunting. I figured I had a good camera in the Nikon and should get some use out of it. Sunday morning I had an 8 pt run a doe across my backyard. I tried but couldn't get a good close up shot of the buck at about 50yards. This has spurred my interest in long distance shooting.

    Thanks all.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    24,581

    Default

    you can buy all the lens you want but you're not going to get in your face shots of any animal in nature without putting yourself into position. By that I mean getting close, even with a 500mm lens. Just by having a 500mm lens and then having a deer lets say at 100yds will take a decent picture but to really get a good shot you've got to be in position to fill the frame of the camera with the lens you're using. So even with a 500mm you're still going to have to do a little bit of work.

    Plus with low light situations you're really going to want to have a lens that is a f 2.8 and those don't come cheap! You can try to get by with some like a f/4.5-5.6 that was suggested above but that's just not going to get the job done.

    Getting into photography isn't cheap especially if you want to get really serious with the craft.
    You've got one life. Blaze on!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    24,581

    Default

    Let me give you an example.

    This picture was taken with a lens at 100mm. A Barred Owl is the size of some small dogs so to get this sort of shot you have to be VERY CLOSE. This is a full frame shot with no cropping. To get this shot I was about 6 1/2 feet away from the Owl. To get that close took A LOT of patience and many trips to the location and some luck!



    You don't necessarily need a long lens (500mm for example) to get close up shots. You just have to use the Zoom instraments that God gave you, your two feet
    You've got one life. Blaze on!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    The Armpit of SC...Columbia
    Posts
    4,531

    Default

    Here's an example much like what Squatty is explaining with the Owl. This was taken from a laying position at 400mm (520mm equivalent Crop Factor) at appx. 10-12ft away. The only way a 500mm lens would help you at large distances, would be to purchase one that would set you back a second mortgage.


  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    24,581

    Default

    Here's an example of a shot with an actual 500mm lens one that will set you back $5 or $6 grand!

    I was about 10 yards away from these Terns. These guys are tiny! Smaller than a dove. I would not have gotten the results of this shot even with the 500mm if I had been a much further distance away. To be honest I wish I had of been about 5 yards closer but it's hard getting up close to birds when they are only thinking about puddin tang!

    You've got one life. Blaze on!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Buck Swamp
    Posts
    4,064

    Default

    great pics

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Camden, SC
    Posts
    811

    Default

    Those are amazing photographs. Thank you for the help.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •