Senior Member
I don’t think stand your ground would apply in this case, right? Since he was a willing participant in the confrontation (and it sounds like he initiated it), he can’t claim self defense, right? That’s the way it was explained to me in CWP class
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.”
Senior Member
I guess the counter-perspective would be that technically, the beef was with the lady in the car, and then the dude coming outta the store was a "second" or "subsequent" issue?Originally Posted by clembo3
Senior Member
That’s a pretty good point. I’m curious how this will play out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.”
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks