Brett Kavanaugh SCOTUS Nominee

**led0321** · 07-10-2018, 02:53 PM

Breitbart seemed happy with the pick. Rush seems happy with the pick. The left has the nevertrumpers convinced Trump picked a swamp creature...

In other news T-Rump is telling Nato to eat shit.

**Moonlight Hunter** · 07-10-2018, 03:00 PM

**Highcotton** · 07-10-2018, 03:09 PM

Judge Napolitano didn't like it.
Fucker was ok with ObamaCare, NSA's collecting of data of private citizens.
If you belive there isn't much difference between Clinton's, Obama', ans Bush's policies, then you wouldn't like this guy. Check Hardiman's background.

**2thDoc** · 07-10-2018, 04:38 PM

highcotton was unhappy with the pick.

i'm not sure how else to be, BT2. Is consistency not something you are fond of? I hate wishy washy people so I guess I like being consistently able to judge each of Trump's actions separately.

**reeltight** · 07-10-2018, 05:17 PM

Originally Posted by 2thDoc

highcotton was unhappy with the pick.

i'm not sure how else to be, BT2. Is consistency not something you are fond of? I hate wishy washy people so I guess I like being consistently able to judge each of Trump's actions separately.

you said "judge"

**2thDoc** · 07-10-2018, 05:23 PM

punny, wasnt it

**Mergie Master** · 07-10-2018, 06:01 PM

This from Brian Fallon the leftist to his tweet peeps. If these are true Trump done good.

**Bigtimber2** · 07-11-2018, 07:12 AM

Originally Posted by 2thDoc

highcotton was unhappy with the pick.

i'm not sure how else to be, BT2. Is consistency not something you are fond of? I hate wishy washy people so I guess I like being consistently able to judge each of Trump's actions separately.

But can you collectively judge Trump's success or failure thus far? He has made many missteps but so far I like the Reagan-ist agenda especially when compared to the alternative.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

**2thDoc** · 07-11-2018, 11:33 AM

I would give him high marks for what he has accomplished thus far.

**Sportin' Woodies** · 07-11-2018, 11:40 AM

Translation:

Choo choo

**Glenn** · 07-11-2018, 12:45 PM

Hmmm

https://reason.com/blog/2018/07/10/s...augh-on-the-fo

**Highcotton** · 07-11-2018, 12:53 PM

Thanks Glenn

**uga_dawg** · 07-11-2018, 12:56 PM

Kavanugh offered two principal explanations for why he considered the program to be constitutional. First, he invoked what's known as the "third-party doctrine," which says that if you voluntarily share private information with a third party, you no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy in that information.

..

But "even if the bulk collection of telephony metadata constitutes a search," Kavanaugh continued, turning to his second justification, the program may still be approved because the Fourth Amendment "bars only unreasonable searches and seizures. And the Government's metadata collection program," he wrote, "readily counts as reasonable" because it "serves a critically important special need—preventing terrorist attacks on the United States." He added: "In my view, that critical national security need outweighs the impact on privacy occasioned by this program."