Santee Cooper covered up in ducks

[Tater]

Oh yeah, my bad

[ecu1984]

Brilliant strategy! Deep thinking at it's finest

[buckfarmer]

And again.....

Keep working on your reading comprehension...Bog said it was him who asked for the thread to be erased, but the question was never answered re the subject matter of that thread.

[GobblerHntr]

Yall haven't figured out that the less you reply to threads like this the quicker they die?

[man down]

I have been up since 4 laying here quietly in the living room and haven't heard the first shot yet. Usually sounds like a war zone by now. There could be thousands of folks out there but it doesn't matter when there are no birds. Guess I'll see boats on trailers headed home shortly
Sad and heart broken.

And isn't the Burleson cat the same one that pissed all the charter guides off?

After riding Saturday an Sunday it's safe to say ill be drinking likker an sleeping in

[Wolf]

I really don't see the big deal with this thread. Lets face it. If it was already in the magazine then the damage is done. Reposting it on here so we can contact the magazine and tell them that it is BS is not hurting anything because many of the rubberheads on here that are cyber scouting most likely have already read it.

But maybe it was a good thing. If they all piled down there on a bad week and wasted their time then maybe they will give up and not go back.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2

[buckfarmer]

I really don't see the big deal with this thread. Lets face it. If it was already in the magazine then the damage is done. Reposting it on here so we can contact the magazine and tell them that it is BS is not hurting anything because many of the rubberheads on here that are cyber scouting most likely have already read it.

But maybe it was a good thing. If they all piled down there on a bad week and wasted their time then maybe they will give up and not go back.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2

Everytime something is republished, it is seen by a new audience. Not everyone reads that magazine, and would never know about the article unless it was republished. Of course, if you republish it on Facebook or another forum, then that many more people would be privy to information they otherwise wouldn't have been aware of. I'm only asking questions to point out the hypocrisy on this site where people get downright nasty over the mention of SC locations, but think it's acceptable to advertise OOS spots.

[NUTZ]

I'm only asking questions to point out the hypocrisy on this site

That's awesome! Maybe Obama will point out all of the shitty politicians one day.

[Duck Tape]

At least I know I will not make his top ten list.

[Gone South]

I really don't see the big deal with this thread. Lets face it. If it was already in the magazine then the damage is done. Reposting it on here so we can contact the magazine and tell them that it is BS is not hurting anything because many of the rubberheads on here that are cyber scouting most likely have already read it.

But maybe it was a good thing. If they all piled down there on a bad week and wasted their time then maybe they will give up and not go back.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2

Yeah all the comments under that post on Facebook where all the rubberheads tagged their Rubberhead buddies is where I'd say the majority of the harm was done.
Jab ain't helping with the articles though.

[Towman]

gots to love it

[buckfarmer]

Yeah all the comments under that post on Facebook where all the rubberheads tagged their Rubberhead buddies is where I'd say the majority of the harm was done.
Jab ain't helping with the articles though.

This^^^^

Everytime something is repeated, more people hear it for the first time. That fact is of no consequence to those that only hunt on their private land a couple times a year, but it will continue to ruin public duck hunting, and will likely have negative impacts in private land as well due to increased pressure.

[Pokechop]

It's Santee.

[buckfarmer]

It's Santee.

It's the concept that is the point.

[BOGSTER]

I really don't see the big deal with this thread. Lets face it. If it was already in the magazine then the damage is done. Reposting it on here so we can contact the magazine and tell them that it is BS is not hurting anything because many of the rubberheads on here that are cyber scouting most likely have already read it.

But maybe it was a good thing. If they all piled down there on a bad week and wasted their time then maybe they will give up and not go back.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2

Yeah all the comments under that post on Facebook where all the rubberheads tagged their Rubberhead buddies is where I'd say the majority of the harm was done.
Jab ain't helping with the articles though.

Why post it to a duck hunting website that is full of slack-assed cyber scouting idgits? Why douse a bonfire with a 5gallon bucket of gas?


.....Because some folks think it's cool to watch the flame.

[295PRO]

Why post it to a duck hunting website that is full of slack-assed cyber scouting idgits? Why douse a bonfire with a 5gallon bucket of gas?





.....Because some folks think it's cool to watch the flame.

Haha.

[Pokechop]

Why post it to a duck hunting website .

That's what a duck hunting website is for correct?

[BOGSTER]

That's what a duck hunting website is for correct?

No. Pokechop

[Tater]

Crappies?

[Goin Coastal]

Crappies?

I read an article or post that said Dead River is full of them. Got to be true. It's on the Internet.